22. Working With Documents and Large Text

Overview and links for this section of the guide.

What this section is for

Most real work involves long text: specs, docs, tickets, policies, legal language, logs, RFCs, and knowledge bases.

This section teaches you how to work with long documents in AI Studio without the two classic failures:

  • Context flooding: pasting too much and getting shallow or wrong answers.
  • Ungrounded synthesis: answers that sound right but can’t be traced back to the source.

Why long-text work fails

Long-text tasks fail for predictable reasons:

  • Context limits: even large context windows have a budget; pasting everything competes with your instructions.
  • Attention dilution: the model may ignore the key paragraph you care about.
  • Contradictions: docs often contain multiple versions of the “truth.”
  • Missing provenance: if you can’t trace claims to sources, you can’t verify.
Long context is a tool, not a plan

Even if you can paste 100 pages, it’s usually not the best workflow. Better workflows allocate context intentionally and demand citations.

A strategy ladder: paste → summarize → chunk → retrieve

Use this ladder to pick the simplest approach that works:

  1. Paste (small doc): if it’s short enough, include it directly, but still demand citations.
  2. Summarize: if you need the gist and can tolerate some loss, summarize with structure and keep a link to the source.
  3. Chunk: split into meaningful chunks with metadata so you can reference sections.
  4. Retrieve: for repeated Q&A, use retrieval so you only include relevant chunks.

Most “doc assistant” prototypes start at chunking and move to retrieval once the loop is valuable.

Artifacts that keep you grounded

Long-text work becomes reliable when you create a few simple artifacts:

  • Chunk index: list of chunk ids with titles/section paths.
  • Citation format: a stable way to reference chunks (e.g., [doc:3.2]).
  • Contradiction notes: a small ledger of conflicting statements and which one you treat as current.
  • Evaluation set: 25–50 questions that matter, used to regression-test changes.

Section 22 map (22.1–22.5)

Where to go next